@entoman, Exactly right – When taking a time lapse picture, for example, the zoom is often not consistent from image to shot. Because of the incredible color contrast and picture integrity to the original scene, the RX10 is very difficult to compete with. I have one, and the combination of the Zeiss lens and the Sony sensor, as well as the integration of both components into a single device, is really unique. This new FZ will almost surely be excellent, particularly considering the low price tag. You would expect that, if not for IBIS, the stabilisation could be disabled when the camera is turned off, as opposed to a sensor that is hung, but I do not believe this is possible with these Panasonic cameras.
The Screen and Viewfinder of the Panasonic Fz1000 II against the Panasonic Fz1000
Getting everything back to the lens neutral position is perhaps too much to ask of one’s body. I believe that optical image stabilization (O.I.S.) provides an electrical method of correcting degraded lenses, as opposed to sensor stabilisation, and that it reduces the importance of lens configuration. I really like these keyboard concept cameras, but having a 1″ sensor slid in to replace a 1/2.3″ sensor while keeping everything else the same, and also wanting to put more pixels on a little 1/2.3″ sensor, takes away one of the FZ330’s greatest advantages. Isn’t it true that we all have an extra-vital organ called a smartphone these days? The power bank is less expensive than a specialized charger with an additional battery. Unless you take more than 300 photos in less than 4 hours, you should be able to charge your camera while you sleep.
Affirmative Arguments in Support of the Panasonic Lumix DMC
Much while this is convenient, it would be even more so if the lens zoomed in and out more quickly, since it takes around 3.5 seconds to traverse the whole range in both directions. Instead of being a whole new camera built from the ground up, this is a refinement of an already-impressive model. Outside, Panasonic has introduced a new front control dial and three new function buttons to the left of the lens, which are intended to replace the lens ring and stabilizer switches that were previously found on the FZ1000. Which of the two cameras – the Panasonic FZ1000 or the Panasonic FZ1000 II – do you think has the advantage? The comparative advantages of the two models are shown in the following table.
Compared to the Panasonic Fz1000 Ii
However, although the lens optics are contained in a metal barrel, this is not on the same level as Sony’s RX10 series, which all have magnesium casings and are weather-resistant in their design. You may either upgrade to the RX10 III and benefit from a greater zoom range, or, if you don’t want to spend too much more money, you can choose the RX10 II, which has a shorter mm f/2.8 zoom lens and is less expensive. The Panasonic FZ1000 II is a bridge-style camera, which means it has a similar shape to a mirrorless model but does not include interchangeable lenses. In order to get proper exposure, FF requires ISO400, whereas MFT requires ISO100. The photographs taken with same-generation sensors will be very comparable in terms of noise and dynamic range. Correct, however since the difference might go either way, we make the assumption that the performances are identical in these comparisons.
Something else that needs to be modified is the placement of the metal tripod mount, which is too close to the optical axis and should be moved to the opposite side of the lens. However, caution should be used when evaluating the review ratings shown above. The evaluations were done in comparison to other cameras of the same technical generation that were comparable in design. As a result, a score must be interpreted in the context of the camera’s debut date and price, and comparisons of Panasonic Lumix DC FZ1000 II vs Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ1000 ratings across very different cameras or over extended time periods are meaningless in this context.
For his next hands-on, Laing takes a look at the Sony Cyber-shot P1, a 3MP tiny camera that was first introduced in 2000. Although it was published more than a year ago, I am hopeful that Panasonic and even Olympus will significantly enhance their sensor by adding greater picture quality and a phase detection autofocus system! Making photographs, no matter how artistically done, is essentially a matter of counting photons. The more the precision with which we can count them, the less noise our photos have, which gives us more latitude in how we analyze them. You’ve gone to great lengths to assert that the exposure is the same, but you’ve still failed to explain why this is important given that exposure has nothing to do with depth of field, light entering the lens, or diffraction. The size of the entry pupil (hence, the “equivalent f-stop”), on the other hand, does not change for a given field of view.
JensR, Things are a lot more straightforward than all of the technical jargon you’re attempting to cram into people’s heads. @Sranang Boi, please share your thoughts on the camera in this thread. It’s adequate for capturing rapid images of perched birds, but the autofocus tracking is a far cry from that of the Sony RX100. The original RX10 was evaluated by Mike at Imaging Resource back in November of that year. Although not as many pages as the Mark 1, there will likely be many more sections than this brief assessment — even if the editors repurpose portions of the previous FZ1000 evaluation from 2014 in this new review.